One summer afternoon in 1965, I was in New York City with my parents. As tourists, we were wandering around the
streets of Manhattan looking for something to do. We passed a cinema on Broadway and decided to
go in and watch a movie. It was called Mirage and starred Gregory Peck. In those days, his name on a marquee was
enough to attract the movie-going public.
This black and white film was directed by Edward Dmytryk and had an
excellent supporting cast of Diane Baker, Walter Matthau, George Kennedy, Kevin
McCarthy, Leif Erickson, and Jack Weston.
The screenplay was written by Peter Stone, who two years earlier had
written the screenplay for the very successful film, Charade (which was nominated for the Academy Award for Best
Original Song), starring Cary Grant, Audrey Hepburn, along with the same Walter
Matthau and George Kennedy.
When we entered the cinema that day, Mirage had already begun. But for us, this was normal. When we would go to the Oswego Theater in my
home town, the decision to go would usually be a spur of the moment one and our
arrival would have no relationship to any movie schedule. We would watch the movie from the point at
which we arrived until the end. Then we
would sit through previews, newsreels, cartoons, serials, and sometimes a
second feature, until finally our movie would begin again. When the point of the movie arrived when we
had entered the theater, we would get up and leave. One of us would say, “This is where we came in.” To
me, that was normal. Today, I think it a
very strange way to see a movie. Today (and
for most of my life) I am guided by the movie schedule. I would not think of entering a theater after
the movie had started.
However, that day in 1965, I am glad
we entered the cinema when we did, after the movie had already begun. Why?
It had to do with the story and how it should have been told.
Mirage begins when David, a chemist who works for a private foundation, has discovered
a way to neutralize nuclear radiation, which is a good thing. However, it creates the possibility of
radiation-free atomic bombs, which can be a bad thing. He takes his yet undeveloped discovery to the
office of the president of the foundation, which is on the twenty-seventh floor of
a New York City skyscraper. David believes
his discovery is too dangerous and decides to destroy the only copy of its
formula. He opens the window and starts
burning the paper it is written on. The
president of the foundation, a humanitarian who believes in the formula’s peaceful
uses, tries to stop him, loses his balance, and falls out of the window.
David, utterly shocked at seeing this
man whom he admires fall to his death, suffers “unconscious amnésia.” He walks out of the president’s office
forgetting who he is and what he has just witnessed (this is where film actually begins). At exactly this point in the movie, my
parents and I entered the cinema. Like
David, we had no idea what had just happened.
All four of us were confused. However,
the rest of the theater audience knew exactly what had happened (wrong). Slowly over the next hour and a half the
mystery is solved. The shock gradually
gives way and David’s memory slowly returns.
In my opinion, the story should have
been told in this manner (and it was): both the
protagonist and the audience equally in the dark. It would have created a more interesting
detective story similar to an earlier Gregory Peck movie (Spellbound directed by Alfred Hitchcock in 1945) where his
character also had amnésia. There, both
Peck and the audience had to simultaneously try to put all the pieces together.
Mirage plays out as a Hitchcock-like suspense thriller. After the shock, David doesn’t remember who
he is, but a beautiful woman tells him they have a relationship. That is a good thing. On the other hand, two gunmen threaten him
for some unknown reason, which is a bad thing.
It all relates to sinister forces that are trying to obtain his formula,
which he has forgotten all about.
However, by the end of the movie, good triumphs over evil. If you get a chance to watch Mirage, which I recommend, it will be a
good lesson in how movies should be edited.
No comments:
Post a Comment